This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Montgomery, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Montgomery, D. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Human Sensitivity to Variability Information in Detection Decisions

Bradley University, Peoria, Illinois

Three studies investigated the ability of observers to extract and use reliability information from graphical elements presented on a visual display. The first experiment assessed observers' accuracy in detecting differences in source reliability based on differences in the temporal variability of the sources. Observers' accuracy improved as the sample size and the difference in the underlying source variability increased. The second study investigated observers' efficiency in using the information about source variability to weight individual sources in forming a decision. Observers were able to differentially weight sources based on the underlying source variability. However, observers' adjustments of the weights tended to be less than ideal, particularly when reliable sources were not spatially contiguous and additional aids (e.g., observation periods and highlights) were unavailable to help observers identify differences in source variability. Finally, evidence in the third study indicated that information about differences in source variability reduced uncertainty about the locations of reliable sources but did not help observers to correctly adjust weights to match the ideal. In application, display enhancements (e.g., highlights) aid decision making when only general differences in reliability need to be recognized, but more advanced decision support is recommended when reliability information has to be incorporated into a decision statistic.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 41, No. 1, 90-105 (1999)
DOI: 10.1518/001872099779577246


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Workman, M. F. Lesser, and J. Kim An exploratory study of cognitive load in diagnosing patient conditions Int. J. Qual. Health Care, June 1, 2007; 19(3): 127 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Maltz and J. Meyer Use of Warnings in an Attentionally Demanding Detection Task Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, January 1, 2001; 43(2): 217 - 226. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Meyer Effects of Warning Validity and Proximity on Responses to Warnings Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, January 1, 2001; 43(4): 563 - 572. [Abstract] [PDF]