This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kline, D. W. Articles by Dewar, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kline, D. W. Articles by Dewar, R. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Older Observers' Tolerance of Optical Blur: Age Differences in the Identification of Defocused Text Signs

University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Kimberly Buck

University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Yvonne Sell

University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Thomas L. Bolan

University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Robert E. Dewar

University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

To determine if visual aging affects the ability to identify blurred text signs in daytime or nighttime viewing conditions, the photopic and mesopic legibility thresholds of young and old adult observers were compared at three levels of optically induced acuity (Experiment 1). For both age groups, legibility was reduced by nighttime luminance and degraded acuity. Surprisingly, older observers were better than younger ones in identifying defocused (optically blurred) text in both daytime and nighttime conditions. In Experiment 2, older observers were also superior to younger ones in identifying defocused standard and spatially matched novel text signs. These findings indicate that older observers' tolerance of optical blur is a generic ability, rather than one explained by familiarity with the low-pass optical profile of specific signs. Consistent with the notion that factors beyond acuity contribute more importantly to text legibility for older than for younger observers, acuity was a stronger predictor of legibility thresholds in the younger group. Actual or potential applications of this research include the need to consider functional acuity in visual screening protocols and the design of text displays, as well as the utilization of compensatory letter-recognition training for older observers or others with diminished acuity.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 41, No. 3, 356-364 (1999)
DOI: 10.1518/001872099779611049


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?