Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Niall, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Niall, K. K.
Right arrow Articles by Martin, E. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Distance Estimation with Night Vision Goggles: A Little Feedback Goes a Long Way

Keith K. Niall

Defence and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Jack D. Reising

Boeing Corporation, Seattle, Washington

Elizabeth L. Martin

Warfighter Training Research Division, Air Force Research Laboratory, Mesa, Arizona

Immediate feedback was given to correct observers' estimates of distance in an experiment in which those estimates were made outdoors at night while observers wore night vision goggles (NVGs). Initially observers made unguided estimates of distances between marked positions in an open field. Those distances ranged from 7.6 m (25 ft) to 64 m (210 ft). Later the same observers made more estimates. After each of these they were told the measured distance between the positions. During this training, the observers' height from the ground plane was either at a standing position or at an elevated position raised 2.3 m (7 ft 7 in) from standing position. After the training -- either immediately after, a week later, or at both times -- observers made unguided estimates of distance for a second time. These latter estimates of ground distance made with the NVGs were improved. Average improvement of the observers' estimates persisted for at least one week after training. This training can be applied to improve clearance estimates and estimates of hover height for pilots of rotarywing aircraft.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 41, No. 3, 495-506 (1999)
DOI: 10.1518/001872099779611012


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyHome page
K. S. Jones, P. R. DeLucia, A. R. Hall, and B. R. Johnson
Can Metric Feedback Training Hinder Actions Involving Distance?
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, June 1, 2009; 51(3): 419 - 432.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyHome page
M. S. Gauthier, A. Parush, T. Macuda, D. Tang, G. Craig, and S. Jennings
The Impact of Night Vision Goggles on Way-Finding Performance and the Acquisition of Spatial Knowledge
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, April 1, 2008; 50(2): 311 - 321.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyHome page
K. R. Young, D. H. Mershon, and L. J. Hicks
The Far-Anchor Effect: Errors in the Perception of Motion and Implications for Aviation Safety
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, January 1, 2002; 44(1): 133 - 143.
[Abstract] [PDF]