This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Thomas, J. S. Articles by Andersson, G. B. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Thomas, J. S. Articles by Andersson, G. B. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Effect of Lifting Belts on Trunk Muscle Activation during a Suddenly Applied Load

Ohio University, Athens, Ohio

Steven A. Lavender

Rush Presbyterian/ St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

Daniel M. Corcos

University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Gunnar B. J. Andersson

Rush Presbyterian/St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health suggests there is insufficient biomechanical or epidemiological evidence to recommend the use of back belts in industry. From a biomechanical perspective, previous work suggests that lifting belts stiffen the torso, particularly in the frontal and transverse planes. To determine whether lifting belts stiffen the torso and alter the trunk muscle response during a sudden loading event, we tested the hypotheses that (a) lifting belts alter peak muscle activity recorded with electromyography (EMG) during sudden loading and (b) lifting belts have a larger impact on trunk muscle response when sudden loads are applied asymmetric to the torso's midsagittal plane. A sudden load was delivered to 10 men and 10 women without history of low back disorder via a cable attached to a thoracic harness; motion was restricted to the lumbar spine. Results indicate that gender was not a significant factor in this study. The lifting belt reduced the peak normalized EMG of the erector spinae muscles on average by 3% during asymmetric loading, though peak normalized EMG was increased by 2% during symmetric loading. Lifting belts have been shown to slightly reduce peak erector spinae activity during asymmetric sudden loading events in a constrained paradigm; however, the effects of lifting belts are too small to provide effective protection of workers. Actual or potential applications include the assessment of lifting belts as protective devices in workers based on the effects of lifting belts on the trunk muscle activity.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 41, No. 4, 670-676 (1999)
DOI: 10.1518/001872099779656662


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?