This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Casali, J. G. Articles by Gauger, D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Casali, J. G. Articles by Gauger, D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Effect of Electronic ANR and Conventional Hearing Protectors on Vehicle Backup Alarm Detection in Noise

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia

Gary S. Robinson

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia

Erika Christian Dabney

Xerox Corporation, Rochester, New York

Dan Gauger

Bose Corporation, Framingham, Massachusetts

An experiment was conducted wherein masked thresholds (using ascending method of limits) for a backup alarm were obtained in pink and red noise at 85 and 100 dBA for 12 participants immersed in a probability monitoring task and wearing a conventional passive hearing protection device (HPD, an earmuff or a foam earplug), an active noise reduction (ANR) headset, or no HPD at all (only in 85 dBA noise). Results revealed statistically significant between-HPD differences in red noise (from 2.3 to 3.1 dB) and in the 100-dBA noise level (from 2.6 to 4.3 dB). An additional finding, which corroborates other studies using different protocols, was that masked thresholds in 85-dBA noise were significantly lower (from 3.2 to 4.4 dB) for the occluded conditions (wearing an HPD) than for the open-ear (unoccluded) condition. This result refutes the belief among many normal-hearing workers that the use of HPDs in relatively low levels of noise compromises their ability to hear necessary workplace sounds. Actual or potential applications of this research include (a) the selection of appropriate HPDs for low-frequency-biased noise exposures wherein signal detection is important and (b) gaining insight into the appropriateness of ANR-based HPDs for certain industrial noise environments.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 46, No. 1, 1-10 (2004)
DOI: 10.1518/hfes.46.1.1.30387


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?