Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gunn, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Corcoran, K. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gunn, D. V.
Right arrow Articles by Corcoran, K. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Target Acquisition With UAVs: Vigilance Displays and Advanced Cuing Interfaces

Daniel V. Gunn

Microsoft Game Studios, Redmond, Washington

Joel S. Warm

Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio

W. Todd Nelson

Air Force Research Laboratory

Robert S. Bolia

Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio

Donald A. Schumsky

University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio

Kevin J. Corcoran

University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio

Vigilance and threat detection are critical human factors considerations in the control of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). Utilizing a vigilance task in which threat detections (critical signals) led observers to perform a subsequent manual target acquisition task, this study provides information that might have important implications for both of these considerations in the design of future UAV systems. A sensory display format resulted in more threat detections, fewer false alarms, and faster target acquisition times and imposed a lighter workload than did a cognitive display format. Additionally, advanced visual, spatial-audio, and haptic cuing interfaces enhanced acquisition performance over no cuing in the target acquisition phase of the task, and they did so to a similar degree. Thus, in terms of potential applications, this research suggests that a sensory format may be the best display format for threat detection by future UAV operators, that advanced cuing interfaces may prove useful in future UAV systems, and that these interfaces are functionally interchangeable.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 47, No. 3, 488-497 (2005)
DOI: 10.1518/001872005774859971


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?