This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Dennerlein, J. T. Articles by DiMarino, M.-H. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Dennerlein, J. T. Articles by DiMarino, M.-H. J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Forearm Electromyographic Changes With the Use of a Haptic Force-Feedback Computer Mouse

Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

Maria-Helena J. DiMarino

Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

Objective: To examine changes in biomechanical and motor control associated with a force-feedback computer mouse. Background: Haptic computer mice can improve the movement times for point-and-click tasks; however, changes in upper extremity biomechanics and motor control are unknown. Method: Eighteen people (ages 22-37 years) performed a point-and-click task 80 times using a force-feedback computer mouse across three different conditions: (a) no force feedback, emulating a conventional mouse; (b) a single attractive force field at the desired target that pulls the mouse to the center of the target; and (c) an attractive force field at the desired target as well as others between the two possible targets, distracting the user from the intended target. Cursor kinematics, wrist posture, and electromyographic (EMG) forearm muscle activity were recorded. Results: The point-and-click movements were 30% faster with the addition of a single force field and 3% faster with the addition of multiple force fields. The Fitts' law index of performance metrics improved from 2.9 bits/response to 4.1 bits/response for multiple attractive fields and to 6.0 bits/response for a single force field. For the distracting force fields, the cursor maximum velocities were over 50% faster. EMG amplitude values were largest for the distracting force fields. These data suggest that the operator uses increased muscle activity to accelerate the mouse through the distracting force fields. Conclusion: When implementing attractive haptic force fields, one needs to consider how to reduce these observed effects of potential distracting force fields. Application: Applications include human-computer interface design for pointing devices extensively used for the graphical user interface.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 48, No. 1, 130-141 (2006)
DOI: 10.1518/001872006776412252


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?