This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Stephan, K. L. Articles by McAnally, K. I. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Stephan, K. L. Articles by McAnally, K. I. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Learning and Retention of Associations Between Auditory Icons and Denotative Referents: Implications for the Design of Auditory Warnings

Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Fishermans Bend, Victoria, Australia

Sean E. Smith

Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Fishermans Bend, Victoria, Australia

Russell L. Martin

Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Fishermans Bend, Victoria, Australia

Simon P. A. Parker

Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Fishermans Bend, Victoria, Australia

Ken I. McAnally

Defence Science and Technology Organisation, Fishermans Bend, Victoria, Australia

Objective: This study examined the way in which the type and preexisting strength of association between an auditory icon and a warning event affects the ease with which the icon/event pairing can be learned and retained. Background: To be effective, an auditory warning must be audible, identifiable, interpretable, and heeded. Warnings consisting of familiar environmental sounds, or auditory icons, have potential to facilitate identification and interpretation. The ease with which pairings between auditory icons and warning events can be learned and retained is likely to depend on the type and strength of the preexisting icon/event association. Method: Sixty-three participants each learned eight auditory-icon/denotative-referent pairings and attempted to recall them 4 weeks later. Three icon/denotative-referent association types (direct, related, and unrelated) were employed. Participants rated the strength of the association for each pairing on a 7-point scale. Results: The number of errors made while learning pairings was greater for unrelated than for either related or direct associations, whereas the number of errors made while attempting to recall pairings 4 weeks later was greater for unrelated than for related associations and for related than for direct associations. Irrespective of association type, both learning and retention performance remained at very high levels, provided the strength of the association was rated greater than 5. Conclusion: This suggests that strong preexisting associations are used to facilitate learning and retention of icon/denotative-referent pairings. Application: The practical implication of this study is that auditory icons having either direct or strong, indirect associations with warning events should be preferred.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 48, No. 2, 288-299 (2006)
DOI: 10.1518/001872006777724426


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?