This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Marshall, D. C. Articles by Austria, P. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Marshall, D. C. Articles by Austria, P. A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Alerts for In-Vehicle Information Systems: Annoyance, Urgency, and Appropriateness

University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

John D. Lee

University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, jdlee{at}engineering.uiowa.edu

P. Albert Austria

University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa

Objective: This study assesses the influence of the auditory characteristics of alerts on perceived urgency and annoyance and whether these perceptions depend on the context in which the alert is received. Background: Alert parameters systematically affect perceived urgency, and mapping the urgency of a situation to the perceived urgency of an alert is a useful design consideration. Annoyance associated with environmental noise has been thoroughly studied, but little research has addressed whether alert parameters differentially affect annoyance and urgency. Method: Three 2³ x 3 mixed within/between factorial experiments, with a total of 72 participants, investigated nine alert parameters in three driving contexts. These parameters were formant (similar to harmonic series), pulse duration, interpulse interval, alert onset and offset, burst duty cycle, alert duty cycle, interburst period, and sound type. Imagined collision warning, navigation alert, and E-mail notification scenarios defined the driving context. Results: All parameters influenced both perceived urgency and annoyance (p < .05), with pulse duration, interpulse interval, alert duty cycle, and sound type influencing urgency substantially more than annoyance. There was strong relationship between perceived urgency and rated appropriateness for high-urgency driving scenarios and a strong relationship between annoyance and rated appropriateness for low-urgency driving scenarios. Conclusion: Sound parameters differentially affect annoyance and urgency. Also, urgency and annoyance differentially affect perceived appropriateness of warnings. Application: Annoyance may merit as much attention as urgency in the design of auditory warnings, particularly in systems that alert drivers to relatively low-urgency situations.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 49, No. 1, 145-157 (2007)
DOI: 10.1518/001872007779598145


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. G. Lenne, T. J. Triggs, C. M. Mulvihill, M. A. Regan, and B. F. Corben Detection of Emergency Vehicles: Driver Responses to Advance Warning in a Driving Simulator Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, February 1, 2008; 50(1): 135 - 144. [Abstract] [PDF]