This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Cochran, D. J. Articles by Ding, X. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Cochran, D. J. Articles by Ding, X. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Perceived and Actual Grasp Forces on Cylindrical Handles

University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, dcochran{at}unlnotes.unl.edu

Yuxiang Chen

University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska

Xuedong Ding

University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska

Objective: To compare the grasp force and the perceived grasp force, as a percentage of the maximum voluntary contraction (MVC), on cylindrical handles and describe a functional relationship between the two. Background: Repeated forceful exertions during work are associated with musculoskeletal disorders, and direct measurement of those forces is often difficult. Estimates are frequently made based on the judgments of force relative to the maximum grasp force capability of the individual. Method: Participants exerted grasp forces on five sizes of cylindrical handles. Pressure values at 16 locations (12 on the fingers and 4 on the distal ends of the metacarpal bones) were measured. Participants were asked to exert what they perceived to be specific percentages (in 10% increments) of their maximum grasp force on each of the five handles. Results: A linear relationship between perceived and actual grasp force was found up to the point of about 80% of perceived MVC. Above that point, the relationship became quadratic. A piecewise regression model was developed to fit the entire range of perceived grasp forces in one model. Conclusion: Grasp force is linear and consistent up until the perceived percentage MVC reaches 80%. After that point the relationship becomes quadratic. Application: In actual application, for grasp on cylindrical handles, practitioners can use a linear relationship between perceived percentage MVC and actual percentage MVC for perceived percentages of 80% or less. Above 80%, the piecewise quadratic relationship should be used.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 49, No. 2, 292-299 (2007)
DOI: 10.1518/001872007X312504


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?