This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Loft, S. Articles by Mooij, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Loft, S. Articles by Mooij, M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Modeling and Predicting Mental Workload in En Route Air Traffic Control: Critical Review and Broader Implications

The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, lofts{at}psy.uq.edu.au

Penelope Sanderson

The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Andrew Neal

The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Martijn Mooij

The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Objective: We perform a critical review of research on mental workload in en route air traffic control (ATC). We present a model of operator strategic behavior and workload management through which workload can be predicted within ATC and other complex work systems. Background: Air traffic volume is increasing worldwide. If air traffic management organizations are to meet future demand safely, better models of controller workload are needed. Method: We present the theoretical model and then review investigations of how effectively traffic factors, airspace factors, and operational constraints predict controller workload. Results: Although task demand has a strong relationship with workload, evidence suggests that the relationship depends on the capacity of the controllers to select priorities, manage their cognitive resources, and regulate their own performance. We review research on strategies employed by controllers to minimize the control activity and information-processing requirements of control tasks. Conclusion: Controller workload will not be effectively modeled until controllers' strategies for regulating the cognitive impact of task demand have been modeled. Application: Actual and potential applications of our conclusions include a reorientation of workload modeling in complex work systems to capture the dynamic and adaptive nature of the operator's work. Models based around workload regulation may be more useful in helping management organizations adapt to future control regimens in complex work systems.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 49, No. 3, 376-399 (2007)
DOI: 10.1518/001872007X197017


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Neal and P. J. Kwantes An Evidence Accumulation Model for Conflict Detection Performance in a Simulated Air Traffic Control Task Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, April 1, 2009; 51(2): 164 - 180. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Fothergill, S. Loft, and A. Neal ATC-labAdvanced: An air traffic control simulator with realism and control Behav Res Methods, February 1, 2009; 41(1): 118 - 127. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Stankovic, E. Raufaste, and P. Averty Determinants of Conflict Detection: A Model of Risk Judgments in Air Traffic Control Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, February 1, 2008; 50(1): 121 - 134. [Abstract] [PDF]