This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lee, D. L. Articles by Dennerlein, J. T. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lee, D. L. Articles by Dennerlein, J. T. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Alternative Computer Mouse Design and Testing to Reduce Finger Extensor Muscle Activity During Mouse Use

Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts

Jacob Fleisher

Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington

Hugh E. McLoone

Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington

Kentaro Kotani

Kansai University, Osaka, Japan

Jack T. Dennerlein

Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, jax{at}hsph.harvard.edu

Objective: The purpose of this study was to design and test alternative computer mouse designs that attempted to reduce extensor muscle loading of the index and middle fingers by altering the orientation of the button switch direction and the force of the switch. Background: Computer users of two-button mouse designs exhibit sustained lifted finger behaviors above the buttons, which may contribute to hand and forearm musculoskeletal pain associated with intensive mouse use. Methods: In a repeated-measures laboratory experiment, 20 participants completed point-and-click, steering, and drag tasks with four alternative mouse designs and a reference mouse. Intramuscular and surface electromyography (EMG) measured muscle loading, and movement times recorded by software provided a measure of performance. Results: Changing the direction of the switch from a conventional downward to a forward design reduced (up to 2.5% maximum voluntary contraction [MVC]) sustained muscle activity (10th percentile EMG amplitude distribution) in the finger extensors but increased (up to 0.6% MVC) flexor EMG and increased movement times (up to 31%) compared with the reference mouse (p < .001). Implementing a high switch force design also increased flexor EMG but did not differ in movement times compared with the reference mouse (p < .001). Conclusion: The alternative mouse designs with altered switch direction reduced sustained extensor muscle loading; however, trade-offs with higher flexor muscle loading and lower performance existed. Application: Potential applications of this study include ergonomic and human computer interface design strategies in reducing the exposure to risk factors that may lead to upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 49, No. 4, 573-584 (2007)
DOI: 10.1518/001872007X215665


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?