This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lacherez, P. Articles by Sanderson, P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lacherez, P. Articles by Sanderson, P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Overlapping Melodic Alarms Are Almost Indiscriminable

The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia

Eunice Limin Seah

The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia

Penelope Sanderson

The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia, psanderson{at}itee.uq.edu.au

Objective: We explore how accurately and quickly nurses can identify melodic medical equipment alarms when no mnemonics are used, when alarms may overlap, and when concurrent tasks are performed. Background: The international standard IEC 60601-1-8 (International Electrotechnical Commission, 2005) has proposed simple melodies to distinguish seven alarm sources. Previous studies with nonmedical participants reveal poor learning of melodic alarms and persistent confusions between some of them. The effects of domain expertise, concurrent tasks, and alarm overlaps are unknown. Method: Fourteen intensive care and general medical unit nurses learned the melodic alarms without mnemonics in two sessions on separate days. In the second half of Day 2 the nurses identified single alarms or pairs of alarms played in sequential, partially overlapping, or nearly completely overlapping configurations. For half the experimental blocks nurses performed a concurrent mental arithmetic task. Results: Nurses' learning was poor and was no better than the learning of nonnurses in a previous study. Nurses showed the previously noted confusions between alarms. Overlapping alarms were exceptionally difficult to identify. The concurrent task affected response time but not accuracy. Conclusion: Because of a failure of auditory stream segregation, the melodic alarms cannot be discriminated when they overlap. Directives to sequence the sounding of alarms in medical electrical equipment must be strictly adhered to, or the alarms must redesigned to support better auditory streaming. Application: Actual or potential uses of this research include the implementation of IEC 60601-1-8 alarms in medical electrical equipment.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 49, No. 4, 637-645 (2007)
DOI: 10.1518/001872007X215719


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. E. Block Jr "For if the trumpet give an uncertain sound, who shall prepare himself to the battle?" (I Corinthians 14:8, KJV) Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 357 - 359. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. N. Wee and P. M. Sanderson Are Melodic Medical Equipment Alarms Easily Learned? Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2008; 106(2): 501 - 508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]