This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Kunde, W. Articles by Heuer, H. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kunde, W. Articles by Heuer, H. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Spatial Compatibility Effects With Tool Use

Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany, kunde{at}fb14.uni-dortmund.de

Jochen Müsseler

Aachen University of Technology, Aachen, Germany

Herbert Heuer

Institute for Occupational Physiology at the University of Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany

Objective: We explored constraints in responding to spatially variable stimuli when hand movements are transformed into inverse movements of a tool. Background: Generally, the spatial compatibility between stimuli and responses is a powerful determinant of performance. However, many tasks require the use of simple tools such as first-class levers that transform hand movements into inverted movements of a tool. What types of compatibility effects arise with such tools? Method: Participants moved the tip of a pointer to the left or right according to the color of a stimulus. The pointer was manipulated either directly, so that a hand movement caused a pointer movement in the corresponding direction, or indirectly, so that the hand moved the pointer in the opposite direction. Results: Responding was faster when the location of stimulus and the movement direction of the tool corresponded than when they did not correspond, independent of the movement direction of the hand. This occurred when stimulus location was task relevant (Experiment 1) as well as when it was task irrelevant (Experiment 2). Furthermore, responding was delayed when the hand and the relevant end of the tool moved in noncorresponding rather than corresponding directions. Conclusion: These results point to two distinct compatibility effects in tool use: one that relates to the transformation of stimuli into goals and one that relates to the transformation of goals into movements. Application: Potential applications of this research include the prediction and possibly manipulation of unwanted "fulcrum effects" in laparoscopic surgery and other first-class lever movements.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 49, No. 4, 661-670 (2007)
DOI: 10.1518/001872007X215737


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?