This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Navarro, J. Articles by Hoc, J.-M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Navarro, J. Articles by Hoc, J.-M. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Lateral Control Assistance for Car Drivers: A Comparison of Motor Priming and Warning Systems

CNRS (Centre national de la recherche scientifique/French National Research Center), Nantes, France

Franck Mars

CNRS (Centre national de la recherche scientifique/French National Research Center), Nantes, France, franck.mars{at}irccyn.ec-nantes.fr

Jean-Michel Hoc

CNRS (Centre national de la recherche scientifique/French National Research Center), Nantes, France

Objective: This paper's first objective is to determine whether motor priming assistance (consisting of directional steering wheel vibrations) can be of some benefit compared with more traditional auditory (lateralized sound) or vibratory (symmetric steering wheel oscillation) warning devices. We hypothesize that warning devices favor driving situation diagnosis, whereas motor priming can improve the initiation of action even further. Another objective is to assess the possible benefits of using multimodal information by combining auditory warning with simple steering wheel vibration or motor priming. Background: Within the context of active safety devices, the experiment dealt with moderately intrusive driving assistance devices that intervene when a certain level of risk in terms of lane departure is reached. Method: An analysis of the steering behavior of 20 participants following episodes of visual occlusion was carried out. Five warning and motor priming devices were compared. Results: All tested devices improved the drivers' steering performance, although their effects were modulated by the drivers' risk assessment. However, performance improvements were found to be greater with a motor priming device. No additional performance enhancement was observed when auditory warning was added to steering wheel vibration or motor priming devices. Conclusion: This study confirms the hypothesis that the direct intervention of motor priming at the action level is more effective than a simple warning, which intervenes upstream in situation diagnosis. Multimodal information did not seem to improve driver performance. Application: This study proposes a new kind of lateral control assistance, which acts at a sensorimotor level, in contrast with traditional warning devices.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 49, No. 5, 950-960 (2007)
DOI: 10.1518/001872007X230280


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?