Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vernieuw, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kolka, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Vernieuw, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by Kolka, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Thermal Comfort and Sensation in Men Wearing a Cooling System Controlled by Skin Temperature

Carrie R. Vernieuw

U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts, carrie.vernieuw{at}gmail.com

Lou A. Stephenson

U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts

Margaret A. Kolka

U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, Massachusetts

Objective: The study was done to determine whether thermal comfort (TC), thermal sensation (TS), and subjective factors gauging environmental stress were negatively affected with different cooling methods in men exercising in chemical protective clothing. Background: Previous studies have reported that intermittent regional cooling improved the efficacy of cooling as compared with constant cooling (CC), but no studies have addressed whether there is any improvement in thermal comfort. Methods: Eight male volunteers exercised at moderate work intensity (425 W) in three microclimate cooling tests. The circulating fluid in the cooling garment was provided during exercise to the head (6% body surface area [BSA]), torso (22% BSA), and thighs (44% BSA) and manipulated under three methods: (a) CC, (b) pulsed cooling (PC), and (c) PC activated by mean skin temperature (Tsk) control (PCskin). TC and TS ratings were recorded every 20 min during the 80-min test. Results: TC and TS ratings were not different for PCskin and CC; thus the participants perceived PCskin as being similar to CC. TS was significantly warmer with PC than with PCskin and CC (p < .001). In PCskin, Tsk was significantly higher than in PC and CC (p < .001), and PC skin was rated as being not as warm as PC according to TS. Conclusion: This indicates that the PC skin method was perceived as being as cool as CC and cooler than PC. Application: These findings indicate that the PCskin cooling method is an acceptable alternative to CC and PC based on human perceptions.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 49, No. 6, 1033-1044 (2007)
DOI: 10.1518/001872007X249893
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?