Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hollands, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hollands, J. G.
Right arrow Articles by Jiang, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Smooth Rotation of 2-D and 3-D Representations of Terrain: An Investigation Into the Utility of Visual Momentum

Justin G. Hollands

Defence Research and Development Canada, Toronto, Canada, justin.hollands{at}drdc-rddc.gc.ca

Nada J. Pavlovic

Defence Research and Development Canada, Toronto, Canada

Yukari Enomoto

Defence Research and Development Canada, Toronto, Canada

Haiying Jiang

Defence Research and Development Canada, Toronto, Canada

Objective: The potential advantage of visual momentum in the form of smooth rotation between two-dimensional (2-D) and three-dimensional (3-D) displays of geographic terrain was examined. Background: The relative effectiveness of 2-D and 3-D displays is task dependent, leading to the need for multiple frames of reference as users switch tasks. The use of smooth rotation to provide visual momentum has received little scrutiny in the task-switching context. A cognitive model of the processes involved in switching viewpoints on a set of spatial elements is proposed. Methods: In three experiments, participants judged the properties of two points placed on terrain depicted as 2-D or 3-D displays. Participants indicated whether Point A was higher than Point B, or whether Point B could be seen from Point A. Participants performed the two tasks in pairs of trials, switching tasks and displays within the pair. In the continuous transition condition the display dynamically rotated in depth from one display format to the other. In the discrete condition there was an instantaneous viewpoint shift that varied across experiments (Experiment 1: immediate; Experiment 2: delay; Experiment 3: preview). Results: Performance after continuous transition was superior to that after discrete transition. Conclusion: The visual momentum provided by smooth rotation helped users switch tasks. Application: The use of dynamic transition is recommended when observers examine multiple views of terrain over time. The model may serve as a useful heuristic for designers. The results are pertinent to command and control, geological engineering, urban planning, and imagery analysis domains.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 50, No. 1, 62-76 (2008)
DOI: 10.1518/001872008X250629


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyHome page
W. Wang and P. Milgram
Viewpoint Animation With a Dynamic Tether for Supporting Navigation in a Virtual Environment
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, June 1, 2009; 51(3): 393 - 403.
[Abstract] [PDF]