This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Thomas, L. C. Articles by Wickens, C. D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Thomas, L. C. Articles by Wickens, C. D. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Display Dimensionality and Conflict Geometry Effects on Maneuver Preferences for Resolving In-Flight Conflicts

Boeing Phantom Works, Seattle, Washington, lcthomas1{at}yahoo.com

Christopher D. Wickens

Alion Science and Technology, Boulder, Colorado

Objective: Two experiments explored the effects of display dimensionality, conflict geometry, and time pressure on pilot maneuvering preferences for resolving en route conflicts. Background: With the presence of a cockpit display of traffic information (CDTI) that provides graphical airspace information, pilots can use a variety of conflict resolution maneuvers in response to how they perceive the conflict. Inconsistent preference findings from previous research on conflict resolution using CDTIs may be attributable to inherent ambiguities in 3-D perspective displays and/or a limited range of conflict geometries. Methods: Pilots resolved predicted conflicts using CDTIs with three levels of display dimensionality; the first had two 2-D orthogonal views, the second depicted the airspace in two alternating 3-D perspective views, and the third had a pilot-controlled swiveling viewpoint. Results: Pilots demonstrated the same preferences that have been observed in previous research for vertical over lateral maneuvers in low workload and climbs over descents for level-flight conflicts. With increasing workload the two 3-D perspective displays, but not the 2-D displays, resulted in an increased preference for lateral over vertical maneuvers. Increased time pressure resulted in increased vertical maneuvers, an effect again limited to the two 3-D perspective displays. Conclusion: Resolution preferences were more affected by workload and time pressure when the 3-D perspective displays were used, as compared with the 2-D displays, although overall preferences were milder than in previous studies. Application: Investigating maneuver preferences using the strategic flight planning paradigm employed in this study may be the key to better ensure pilot acceptance of computer-generated resolution maneuvers.

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 50, No. 4, 576-588 (2008)
DOI: 10.1518/001872008X312288


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. D. Wickens, S. Rice, D. Keller, S. Hutchins, J. Hughes, and K. Clayton False Alerts in Air Traffic Control Conflict Alerting System: Is There a "Cry Wolf" Effect? Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, August 1, 2009; 51(4): 446 - 462. [Abstract] [PDF]