This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Morineau, T. Articles by Jannin, P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Morineau, T. Articles by Jannin, P. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Decision Making During Preoperative Surgical Planning

University of Southern Brittany, Vannes, France, thierry.morineau{at}univ-ubs.fr

Xavier Morandi

Nadège Le Moëllic

University of Southern Brittany, Vannes, France

Sylma Diabira

INSERM, Rennes, France

Laurent Riffaud

INSERM, Rennes, France

Claire Haegelen

INSERM, Rennes, France

Pierre-Louis Hénaux

INSERM, Rennes, France

Pierre Jannin

INSERM, Rennes, France

Objective: This study analyzes decision making during preoperative surgical planning through two cognitive indicators: conflict and cognitive control. Background: Planning is a critical stage in naturalistic decision making, and there is some evidence suggesting that this activity depends on the level of expertise and the demands of the task. The specificity of surgery resides in the necessity to cope with (potential) conflicts between the purpose of the surgical intervention and the biological laws governing the patient's body. Method: Six neurosurgeons (two board-certified neurosurgeons, two chief residents, and two residents) described the operative procedure envisaged on nine surgical cases of increasing surgical complexity. A detailed analysis of one surgical case described by one expert was performed. Moreover, we measured the number of conflicts and controls reported by each surgeon. Results: Two experts were the only ones for which the report of conflicts increased with surgical complexity (respectively, 75% and 73% of the conflict variance predicted by complexity). The two experts significantly activated a higher proportion of knowledge-based control (respectively, 43% and 38%) than did intermediates and residents. The residents significantly activated more motor skill—based controls (respectively, 40% and 44%) than did intermediates and experts. Conclusion: It seems that expert surgical decision making to cope with task demands is significantly associated with conflict monitoring. Knowledge-based control to regulate conflict is mainly produced by experts. Application: Conflicts and controls analyzed through verbal reports can be used as relevant indicators to highlight critical moments in decision making that potentially require assistance from information systems.

Key Words: situation awareness • decision making • naturalistic decision making • expert-novice differences • automation • attentional processes • cognitive processes • expert systems • health and medical systems • cognitive engineering • surgery • verbal protocol analysis • cognitive control • planning • medical expertise • problem solving

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 51, No. 1, 67-77 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0018720809332847


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?