This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0018720809339621v1 51/3/378    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Caro, S. Articles by Vienne, F. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Caro, S. Articles by Vienne, F. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Can Headway Reduction in Fog Be Explained by Impaired Perception of Relative Motion?

Institut National de Recherche sur les Transports et leur Sécurité, Versailles, France, stephane.caro{at}inrets.fr

Viola Cavallo

Institut National de Recherche sur les Transports et leur Sécurité, Versailles, France

Christian Marendaz

Université Pierre-Mendès-France, Grenoble, France

Erwin R. Boer

Entropy Control, Inc., La Jolla, California

Fabrice Vienne

Institut National de Recherche sur les Transports et leur Sécurité, Paris, France

Objective: The goal of this study was to provide a better understanding of driver behavior in fog. Background: Impaired perception of changes in headway is hypothesized to be one of the reasons for shorter following distances in foggy conditions as compared with clear weather. Method: In the experiments described here, we measured response time for discriminating between whether the vehicle ahead is getting closer or farther away. Several visibility conditions were studied, ranging from a no-fog condition to a condition in which the vehicle could be seen only by its rear fog lights. Results: Fog conditions increased response times when the outline of the vehicle was barely visible or not visible at all. The longer response times in fog were attributable to the low contrast of the vehicle outline when still visible and to the smaller spacing between the two lights when the outline could not be properly perceived. Moreover, response times were found to be shorter for shorter following distances and for faster accelerations. Conclusion: Reducing headway could be a way for drivers to achieve faster discrimination of relative motion in foggy weather. More specifically, shortening one’s following distance until visibility of the lead vehicle changes from bad to good may have a perceptual control benefit, insofar as the response time gain compensates for the reduction in headway under these conditions. Applications: Potential applications include improving traffic safety. The results provide a possible explanation for close following in fog and point out the importance of rear-light design under these conditions.

Key Words: driver behavior • car following • fog • visibility conditions • relative motion • response time • highway safety • vision • reaction time • psychomoter processes • surface transportation systems • sensory and perceptual processes • foggy driving conditions • driving in fog • weather • following distances • distance headway • time headway • car acceleration • perceptual-control benefit • response-time gain • reduction in headway • contrast • fog lights • spacing between lights • rear-light design

This version was published on June 1, 2009

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 51, No. 3, 378-392 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0018720809339621


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?