This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0018720809337716v1 51/3/404    most recent References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lenneman, J. K. Articles by Backs, R. W. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lenneman, J. K. Articles by Backs, R. W. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Cardiac Autonomic Control During Simulated Driving With a Concurrent Verbal Working Memory Task

Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan, lenneljk{at}cmich.edu

Richard W. Backs

Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, Michigan

Objective: The objective of the study was to illustrate sensitivity and diagnosticity differences between cardiac measures and lane-keeping measures of driving performance. Background: Previous research suggests that physiological measures can be sensitive to the effects of driving and side task performance and diagnostic of the source of the attentional demands. We hypothesized that increases in side task difficulty would elicit physiological change without reduction of driving task performance and that the side task demands would elicit patterns of autonomic activity that map to specific attentional processing resources. Method: Separately and concurrently, thirty-two participants performed a simulated driving task and verbal working memory task (with two levels of difficulty, 0 back and 3 back) separately and concurrently. Attentional demands were assessed through physiological and performance measures. Results: Cardiac measures reflected changes in attentional demand from single- to dual-task driving with an n-back task, whereas lane-keeping measures did not. Furthermore, patterns of autonomic activity elicited by driving, n-back task, and dual-task driving with a 3-back task were consistent with our predictions about autonomic activity. Conclusion: Changes in cardiac measures without changes in lane-keeping measures provide evidence that cardiac measures can be sensitive to hidden costs in attention that do not manifest in coarse measures of driving performance. Furthermore, correct predictions regarding the patterns of autonomic activity elicited suggests that cardiac measures can serve as diagnostic tools for attention assessment. Application: Because of the demonstrated differences in sensitivity and diagnosticity, researchers should consider the use of cardiac measures in addition to driving performance measures when studying attention in a driving simulator environment.

Key Words: sensitivity and diagnosticity differences • cardiac measures • driving performance • attentional demands • driving simulator

This version was published on June 1, 2009

Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Vol. 51, No. 3, 404-418 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0018720809337716


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?